Skip to content

Save the Occupation! But Let The Poor Kids Die!

October 3, 2007

Not that it should come as a surprise, but King George W. Bushtard vetoed a bipartisan bill to expand the SCHIP children’s health plan by 35 billion dollars over the next five years. Compare the proposed 35 billion increase spread over five years to the 150 billion dollar request by his majesty to continue the occupation of Iraq.

It is certainly good to know that our compassionate conservatard decider in chief cares more about paying his Halliburton and Blackwater leaches than helping keep American children healthy. According to King George’s logic, he is keeping America safe by fighting the Islam-O-Fascists over in Iraq. And at the same time he is helping to shorten the lifespan of American children. A win-win situation in his mind we guess.

It makes us at The Conservatard ask who the greater threat is. Is it the Islam-O-Fascists or the King Bushtard? God bless the good old US of A!

From CNN:

Bush vetoes expansion of kids’ health insurance program

WASHINGTON (CNN) — President Bush on Wednesday vetoed legislation expanding a children’s health insurance program by $35 billion over five years.


President Bush says he vetoed the SCHIP bill because it was a step toward “federalizing” medicine.

Bush exercised the veto at 10 a.m. ET before leaving the White House for a trip to Lancaster, Pennsylvania, to discuss the federal budget and taxes.Speaking in Pennsylvania, Bush said he vetoed the bill because it was a step toward “federalizing” medicine and inappropriately expanded the program beyond its focus on helping poor children.

“I believe in private medicine, not the federal government running the health care system. I do want Republicans and Democrats to come together to support a bill that focuses on the poorer children,” the president said, adding the government’s policy should be to help people find private insurance.Video Watch Bush explain his veto »

Democrats quickly took to the floors of the Senate and House of Representatives to condemn the veto of the bill that received bipartisan support.

“I think that this is probably the most inexplicable veto in the history of the country. It is incomprehensible. It is intolerable. It’s unacceptable,” said Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Massachusetts, who pleaded with Republicans to help overturn the veto.

Congress sent the legislation on the State Children’s Health Insurance Program, or SCHIP, to the White House on Tuesday after the Senate voted 67-29 last week to expand the program.

Bush’s veto. Though 67 votes in the 100-person Senate would suffice to override a veto, the 265-159 House vote on September 25 is short of the two-thirds majority needed.

However, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said she would try to get the 15 additional Republican votes she said she needed to overturn Bush’s veto, noting that “2-to-1 Republican voters support SCHIP and oppose the president’s veto.”

“It’s very sad that the president has chosen to veto a bill that would provide health care to 10 million American children for the next five years. It is a value that is shared by the American people across the board,” Pelosi said.

House Democrats also were quick to compare the bill’s $7 billion annual cost to the money spent each month on the Iraq war.

“The president and Republicans in Congress say that we can’t afford this bill, but where were the fiscal conservatives when the president demanded hundreds of billions of dollars for the war in Iraq?” asked Rep. Jan Schakowsky, D-Illinois.

Some House Republicans, however, said Bush was right to veto the bill.

“The public can see that we’re playing more political ‘gotcha’ than we are at really solving problems,” said Rep. Todd Akin, R-Missouri, who said the legislation contained “all of these little hidden gizmos, among other things that we’re going to provide health care to the children of illegal immigrants.”

Akin also said the bill would have led to “a massive expansion of, basically, ‘Hillary’ socialized medicine,” a reference to Sen. Hillary Clinton of New York and her unsuccessful health care efforts as first lady in the 1990s.

Democrats denied the bill would provide coverage to illegal immigrants.

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Maryland, said Tuesday that he won’t schedule an override vote on SCHIP until next week or later. There is no time limit in the House on when to bring the bill up again.

Under the legislation, the program would double — from 4 million to 8 million — the number of children covered.

In the Senate, 18 Republicans joined all of the Democrats in voting to expand the program from its annual budget of $5 billion to $12 billion for the next five years.

Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah was among those Republicans who split from the president. “It’s very difficult for me to be against a man I care so much for,” he told his colleagues on the Senate floor before the vote. “It’s unfortunate that the president has chosen to be on what, to me, is clearly the wrong side of this issue.”

A Washington Post-ABC News poll conducted September 27-30 found 72 percent of those surveyed support an increase in spending on the program, with 25 percent opposed. The poll’s margin of error was 3 percentage points.

Bush and many Republicans contend the program’s original intent would be changed under the bill.

The program gives coverage to parents who make too much to qualify for Medicaid but not enough to buy private insurance for their children. Critics have said their concern is that parents might be prompted to drop private coverage for their children to get cheaper coverage under the bill.

The veto is the fourth of Bush’s presidency. After not using his veto power at all during his first four years, the president has vetoed three other bills in his second term: two on stem-cell research legislation and one on a war funding bill with a Democratic timetable for withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq.

2 Comments leave one →
  1. kip permalink
    October 3, 2007 9:17 pm

    It really looks like Bush cares more about the oil in Iraq than the American people.

  2. October 5, 2007 4:38 am

    Some more of that Chimpy “compassionate conservatism.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: