The Conservatard

A depressing but all to true story about the dwindling middle class of America. This is the real goal of the Conservative Revolution, to destroy the middle class and create a two class system. On the top, a small but extremely rich and privileged few, with the majority of workers scavenging just to survive and serve the elite.

The real war on our freedom does not use terrorists, bombs or guns. It mostly involves finances, trade deals and corruption of politicians to server corporate interests. The war on Americas freedom was first started by Ronald Reagan in the 80’s, ramped up by Newt Gingrich in the 90’s and is being fulfilled for corporate profits by the Bush administration today. Time to move to someplace where the government treats its citizens correctly, like Myanmar (Burma).

Blue-Collar Jobs Disappear, Taking Families’ Way of Life Along

By Erik Eckholm
The New York Times

Wednesday 16 January 2008

Jackson, Ohio - After 30 years at a factory making truck parts, Jeffrey Evans was earning $14.55 an hour in what he called “one of the better-paying jobs in the area.”

Wearing a Harley-Davidson cap, a bittersweet reminder of crushed dreams, he recently described how astonished and betrayed he felt when the plant was shut down in August after a labor dispute. Despite sporadic construction work, Mr. Evans has seen his income reduced by half.

So he was astonished yet again to find himself, at age 49, selling off his cherished Harley and most of his apartment furniture and moving in with his mother.
(more…)

Ronald Reagan probably described the current state of world economics best when he talked about “trickle down economics”. Bush Sr. called it “Voodoo Economics”, but I think old Ronny was at least half right, the poor do get a trickle down from a booming economy while the rich get the flood of the wealth. And when the rich really screw up and loose billions, like lets say selling the world financial products based on sub prime mortgages, then it is is the duty of the working poor to bail out their financial masters.

A better expression of the outrage that Mr. C is feeling has been expressed by Chris Floyd. He goes into how we the tax paying public are bing set up by our respective governments to bail out the idiot bankers that are ruining the American economy and that of the rest of the world.

Billionaire Bailout: Central Bank Socialism and America’s True Values

Written by Chris Floyd
Thursday, 13 December 2007

It is not exactly news that the Western world’s fetishized “free market” is actually a mixed economy, combining cradle-to-the-grave socialism for the rich with ball-breaking, bomb’s-away capitalism for everyone else. This truism was on naked display once again this week as the central banks of the United States, Britain, Switzerland, Canada and the Eurozone announced plans to provide almost $100 billion in taxpayer money to save their banking brethren from the consequences of their own greed and stupidity.

The bailout is, indirectly, a response to the mortgage crisis that has seen whole neighborhoods across America depopulated and abandoned as dodgy loans come home to roost. For years, the bankers shilled the “American Dream” of home ownership to people who couldn’t really afford it, via a plethora of gussied-up con jobs which were then repackaged as various complex “financial instruments” and sold on down the line to other rubes. The financial elite made untold billions from shuffling this worthless paper around, touting it to pension funds, state investment funds, schools, small-scale investors, etc. It was a house of cards standing on a one-legged table, and it finally fell, as anyone except a highly educated, well-remunerated investment banker could have foreseen.

(more…)

Today, Tom Hamburger, a Los Angeles Times Staff Writer published a story called “Chamber of Commerce vows to punish anti-business candidates“. What a surprise, the US Chamber of Commerce playing hardball?

This is the same U.S. Camber of Commerce that has helped export over 3 million U.S. manufacturing jobs in the last seven years. The same group of elitist authoritarians that have spurned the criminal sub prime mortgage scandals, degraded worker unions, lobbied for tax breaks for the wealthiest 1% of the population and run more negative attack ads than any other political group.

To get an ideal of how anti-worker and elitist the Chamber of commerce really is, all you need to do is listen to read a quote from U.S. Chamber of Commerce President Tom Donohue.

“I’m concerned about anti-corporate and populist rhetoric from candidates for the presidency, members of Congress and the media,” he said. “It suggests to us that we have to demonstrate who it is in this society that creates jobs, wealth and benefits — and who it is that eats them.”

So what Tom Donohue is basically saying is that he is concerned that some cronies, err.. politicians are actually starting to “listen” to what the slaves have been complaining about. And waht the U.S. Chamber of Commerce needs to do is to “remind” these “wayward” politicians, by way of a $60,000,000 + public lynching, of who they really work for.

Sounds like Mr. Donohue is a real constitutional scholar and a true believer in human rights. Perhaps he could be appointed “Vice-Emperor” for life after tricky Dick Cheney’s heart finally gives up and decides to ditch the current Vice-Emperor body.

Chamber of Commerce vows to punish anti-business candidates

The group indicates it will spend in excess of the approximately $60 million it put out in the last presidential cycle.

By Tom Hamburger
Los Angeles Times Staff Writer

January 8, 2008

WASHINGTON — Alarmed at the increasingly populist tone of the 2008 political campaign, the president of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is set to issue a fiery promise to spend millions of dollars to defeat candidates deemed to be anti-business.

“We plan to build a grass-roots business organization so strong that when it bites you in the butt, you bleed,” chamber President Tom Donohue said.

The warning from the nation’s largest trade association came against a background of mounting popular concern over the condition of the economy. A weak record of job creation, the sub-prime mortgage crisis, declining home values and other problems have all helped make the economy a major campaign issue.

Presidential candidates in particular have responded to the public concern. Former Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina has been the bluntest populist voice, but other front-running Democrats, including Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York and Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois, have also called for change on behalf of middle-class voters.

On the Republican side, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee — emerging as an unexpected front-runner after winning the Iowa caucuses — has used populist themes in his effort to woo independent voters, blasting bonus pay for corporate chief executives and the effect of unfettered globalization on workers.

Reacting to what it sees as a potentially hostile political climate, Donohue said, the chamber will seek to punish candidates who target business interests with their rhetoric or policy proposals, including congressional and state-level candidates.

(more…)

All of Mr. Conservatard’s reader(s?) know exactly how Mr. C feels about impeachment of the Bushtard regime. However, when The Washington Post places an op-ed about impeachment right on their front page, you know that the tide may be turning.

Below is an op-ed from George McGovern, who lost to Nixon back in the day. His op-ed is presented here for educational purposes 0nly. A link is also provided so that the reader can go to the actual piece at washingtonpost.com.

Why I Believe Bush Must Go
Nixon Was Bad. These Guys Are Worse.

By George McGovern
Sunday, January 6, 2008; B01

As we enter the eighth year of the Bush-Cheney administration, I have belatedly and painfully concluded that the only honorable course for me is to urge the impeachment of the president and the vice president.

After the 1972 presidential election, I stood clear of calls to impeach President Richard M. Nixon for his misconduct during the campaign. I thought that my joining the impeachment effort would be seen as an expression of personal vengeance toward the president who had defeated me.

Today I have made a different choice.

Of course, there seems to be little bipartisan support for impeachment. The political scene is marked by narrow and sometimes superficial partisanship, especially among Republicans, and a lack of courage and statesmanship on the part of too many Democratic politicians. So the chances of a bipartisan impeachment and conviction are not promising.

But what are the facts?

(more…)